Israel mais uma vez mostra porque é, em muitas pesquisas feitas, o país mais odiado do mundo



Descargar 141 Kb.
Página1/2
Fecha de conversión10.05.2018
Tamaño141 Kb.
Vistas100
Descargas0
  1   2

Programa humorístico: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qp8pMmkHqU8

http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=106991
01-06-2010
Piratas sionistas contra pistolas de pintura
Antonio Pérez

Rebelión
Seis días antes de la masacre de la Flotilla de la Libertad, una de los más conspicuos judíos anti-sionistas, el anciano ex diputado israelí Uri Avnery, publicaba un artículo en el que llegaba a la conclusión de que el actual Gobierno sionista ha conseguido lo que buscaba: devolver a los israelíes la sensación de que todo el mundo está contra ellos. Con amarga ironía, Avnery argumentaba que los sionistas se desintegran cuando pierden esos mecanismos de defensa que, con razón o sin ella, han desarrollado a lo largo de los siglos por lo que sólo son felices cuando se sienten despreciados y amenazados (ver Counterpunch, 25.V.2010) De ser cierta esta tesis, es indudable que Netanyahu y Ehud Barak pueden estar contentos: hoy tienen muchísimos más motivos para verse como víctimas de la incomprensión mundial.

Breve relación de algunas piraterías sionistas

8 de junio de 1967. Aviones y barcos torpederos sionistas atacan en aguas internacionales al buque gringo USS Liberty causando no menos de 34 muertos y 171 heridos. Los sionistas impidieron así un hipotético e improbable obstáculo contra su ataque a Siria. Hasta la fecha, este acto de suprema piratería sigue siendo el único incidente no investigado por el Congreso de los EEUU.

23 de agosto de 2008. Dos minúsculas embarcaciones fletadas por el Free Gaza Movement (FGM) llegan a Gaza.

29 de octubre de 2008. El yate Dignity, fletado por el FGM llega a Gaza [Tres intentos posteriores del FGM de llevar a Gaza ayuda humanitaria se saldaron con sendos ametrallamientos, varios heridos y asalto final a los barcos antes de que pudieran atracar en su destino]

24 de julio de 2009. So pretexto de que transporta armas para Siria e Irán, el Mossad secuestra el barco finlandés Artic Sea. El 14.agosto, es “encontrado” –vacío, claro está- por la marina rusa en aguas próximas a Cabo Verde. La imaginativa versión ruso-sionista es que transportaba madera y que fue abordado por el ala dura de los ecologistas.

17 de mayo de 2010. Brasil, Turquía e Irán firman un contrato nuclear: Irán depositará en territorio turco 1.200 kgs. de uranio iraní enriquecido al 3,5% que le será devuelto enriquecido al 20%. Para colmo, en el mismo acto, el ministro turco de Relaciones Exteriores Ahmet Davitoglu “exhortó a la comunidad internacional a renunciar a adoptar nuevas sanciones contra Irán”.

Para demostrar que en Gaza no hay crisis humanitaria por la sencilla razón de que no hay bloqueo pues Israel les provee de todo a los gazatíes, la oficina del Primer Ministro distribuye entre otros lujos disponibles en la Franja, menús de los restaurantes de Gaza en los que destacan la crema de espinacas y el filete Stroganoff.

Matanza nocturna en alta mar

31 de mayo de 2010.- Con las agravantes de premeditación, alevosía, exceso de fuerza, desprecio de sexo, nocturnidad y trasgresión de las leyes del mar –piratería-, comandos de la fuerza de élite Shayetet 13, asaltaron la Flotilla de la Libertad en aguas internacionales. Aunque ni siquiera estaban provistos de lacrimógenas sino sólo armados con pistolas de pintura (paintball guns), la resistencia (estúpida e incomprensible) que ofrecieron los semidormidos activistas humanitarios obligó a los tiernos marines sionistas a masacrar a decenas de pasajeros –a quienes, pequeño detalle, previamente les habían cortado Internet-.

Si permitieron dos veces la llegada a Gaza de barcos humanitarios, ¿por qué esta vez Israel ha masacrado a unos inermes civiles? Dejemos aparte dos hechos que nos parecen menores: uno, que los anteriores barcos eran minúsculos; dos, que desde aquellas arribadas ha cambiado el Gobierno sionista. Entremos en temas mayores clasificando las múltiples explicaciones y causas que se esconden tras esta matanza, todas ellas independientes de la (siniestra) suerte que Israel reserva a sus esclavos gazatíes:

1) el ataque va dirigido realmente contra Turquía, el más próximo de los firmantes del contrato con Irán. El remoto Brasil queda para una segunda fase e Irán, ad calendas graecas como veremos más adelante.

2) Rahm Emmanuel, capitán del ejército sionista (IDF o Tsahal), hijo de terrorista del Irgun y mano derecha de Obama, acaba de visitar Israel so pretexto de que su hijo cumpla el rito de iniciación judía llamado Bar Mitzva. En otras palabras, EEUU ha dado luz verde a la masacre, probablemente para compensar al proverbial sadismo sionista por la firma del contrato antes citado y, con toda seguridad, para garantizar el apoyo del lobby sionista a Obama de cara a las elecciones gringas del próximo 2 de noviembre.

3) el ataque va también contra la unidad del pueblo palestino. Por lo pronto, el muy corrupto dizque presidente Mahmud Abbas se ha limitado a adoptar medidas tan rutinarias como simbólicas -tres días de luto oficial en Cisjordania- a la vez que mantiene el “diálogo” con Tel Aviv.

4) la matanza es un regalo a los sionistas ultraortodoxos. Los Haredin dejarán momentáneamente de incordiar y no digamos los poseídos de la furia del converso -los inmigrantes rusos-. En los últimos días, estos asesinos no estaban satisfechos con crucificar a la soldado Anat Kamm por el supuesto delito de hablar con la prensa ni tampoco con haber metido en la cárcel por enésima vez a Mordechai Vanunu –el héroe judío que denunció la bomba nuclear sionista-. Querían más y ya lo tienen.

5) este acto de piratería también va encaminado a escindir a las ONG. Dicho de otra manera, busca satanizar y amedrentar a las más humanitarias para que, de una vez por todas, dejen de molestar a las ONG tecnocráticas.

Todo ello por lo que respecta a la inmediata actualidad politico-fáctica. Desde la psicología social –una disciplina algo fantasiosa- podemos añadir que, siendo el sadomasoquismo la principal seña de identidad de ese Estado teocrático y militarista –añadir racista y genocida sería redundancia- que dice ser la suprema expresión moderna del judaísmo, los sionistas se notaban masoquistas por haber dejado entrar a unos barquichuelos ergo lo han tenido que compensar con el sadismo de una gran masacre.

Más aún, antes del famoso contrato tripartito, Irán ya se había blindado contra una agresión gringo-sionista mediante el ardid de firmar sustanciosos convenios con Rusia y, sobre todo, con el amo del dólar: China. Atacados en la parte más débil de su anatomía –el bolsillo-, los EEUU se sintieron impotentes y así se lo hicieron saber a Israel, su hijo travieso. Pero éste, caprichoso como todo niño mimado, a cambio quería romper algún juguete. Sabiendo que el castigo de papá no pasará de una regañina cara a los vecinos, ya lo ha roto.



El mañana

Creación de innumerables comisiones de investigación: la ONU, la Unión Europea, la Liga Árabe, incluso los EEUU y puede que hasta el Vaticano competirán en presentar las mentiras y medias verdades mejor empaquetadas. Un ejemplo reciente de hasta dónde llegan estas comisiones: el 20 de enero de 2010, el Mossad asesinó en Dubai a un palestino. Pocos días después se demostró que los asesinos habían utilizado falsos pasaportes europeos, ingleses en su mayoría. El Reino Unido convocó al embajador israelí y el entonces premier Brown prometió crear una comisión de investigación. Desde entonces, ¿alguien ha oído hablar de ella?

Manipulación mediática: Que se prepare la Alianza de las Civilizaciones porque se centrará en la difamación de Turquía. Para subrayar que ha actuado en defensa propia, Israel inventará haber sufrido “algunas” bajas. Estará prohibido hablar de tropezones, ineptitud, precipitación, confusión entre las propias filas y, por supuesto, será anatema mencionar siquiera el “fuego amigo”. Además, las agencias amigas –Reuters en especial-, inundarán al mundo con imágenes espeluznantes de la “insania turca” –como todos sabemos, heredera directa del genocidio armenio y de los empalamientos, suplicio favorito de los pérfidos sultanes-. De hecho, Israel ya ha difundido unas primeras fotos en las que se aprecia a un supuesto pasajero amenazando a la Humanidad con un cuchillo curvo. Según la propaganda sionista, es obvio que, siendo feo y barbudo, sólo puede un terrorista camuflado -turco desde luego y probablemente amigo de Alí Agca, ahora cristiano pero antes frustrado asesino de Juan Pablo II-.

Como postre, las mismas agencias de desinformación nos abrumarán con conmovedoras narraciones sobre los amorosos cuidados que los hospitales israelíes han brindado a los humanitarios heridos.

Esta manipulación no se limitará a invenciones y/o medias verdades sino que no se detendrá ante la mentira pura y dura. Ejemplo: han querido desprestigiar a la Flotilla acusándola de negarse a llevar una carta a Gilad Shalit –el soldado israelí preso en Gaza- cuando la verdad es que, bajo la amenaza de usar las armas, horas antes de zarpar obligaron a la Flotilla a no admitir la susodicha carta.

Ataques a Brasil: Obviamente, no serán ataques directos sino sinuosos. Pronto oiremos hablar de la destrucción de la Amazonia, de la esclavitud en Pará y de lo chapuceros que son los productos brasileros. En esta campaña, no estarán solos los medios sionistas –la inmensa mayoría de los verdaderamente planetarios- sino que también les acompañarán los gringos pues, a fin de cuentas, ellos son los más perjudicados por el surgimiento de ese tercer polo que representa la diplomacia brasileña.

En cuanto a la joya de la corona sionista –sus servicios secretos-, la batalla está servida. Por ahora, el Mossad y sus innumerables otras agencias hermanas saben que quienes lograron introducir al presidente Zelaya en la embajada de Brasil y quienes han preparado en el mayor sigilo el contrato con Irán no son enemigo pequeño. Esperemos que esta deducción no les lleve a recurrir contra los brasileños a su método habitual –el asesinato-.

Vídeo do terceiro dia no navio Mavi Marvara: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOQM6KMeOBA

http://www.telesurtv.net/noticias/contexto/1992/-iquesta-que-se-debe-el-ataque-israeli-contra-civiles-en-el-mediterraneo/

¿A qué se debe el ataque israelí contra civiles en el Mediterráneo?

Israel estudió de antemano las consecuencias del ataque que finalmente perpetró contra el convoy humanitario marítimo. ¿Qué objetivos busca con el desencadenamiento de esta crisis diplomática de escala mundial? ¿Por qué desafía Tel Aviv a su aliado turco y a su protector estadounidense?

Por:  Thierry Meyssan


El ataque que tres navíos lanzadores de misiles clase Saar de la Marina de Guerra israelí perpetraron el 31 de mayo de 2010 contra la Flotilla de la Libertad, en aguas internacionales del Mediterráneo, es una demostración de la decisión de Tel Aviv de ''huir hacia el frente''.

La Flotilla de la Libertad es una iniciativa de los militantes por la defensa de los derechos humanos [1] [2] que obtuvo el apoyo del gobierno turco. Su objetivo consiste simultáneamente en llevar ayuda humanitaria a la población de la franja de Gaza y en romper de esa forma el bloque ilegalmente implantado por el ejército israelí contra el millón y medio de personas que viven en esa región.

A la luz del derecho internacional, la decisión de abordar barcos civiles en aguas internacionales constituye un «acto de guerra». Jurídicamente hablando, hubo robo de barcos y de la carga de dichos barcos, secuestro de pasajeros de dichas embarcaciones y homicidio, o sea asesinato, e incluso premeditación, según informaciones de la televisión turca que afirman que los comandos israelíes tenían una lista de personalidades que debían ser eliminadas durante el asalto.

Este acto de guerra, cometido contra barcos que navegaban bajo las banderas de Grecia y Turquía, fue perpetrado como medio de perpetuar el bloqueo, que constituye en sí mismo una violación del derecho internacional.

Al recurrir al argumento de la «legítima defensa», las autoridades israelíes proclaman explícitamente su propia soberanía sobre las aguas internacionales de 69 millas náuticas frente a las costas palestinas ya que necesitan esa anexión, temporal o duradera, para garantizar el mantenimiento del bloqueo, medida que presentan como una necesidad de seguridad del Estado de Israel.

Al abordar un barco turco y matar a varios de los pasajeros que viajaban a bordo del mismo, Tel Aviv decide en primer lugar dar una respuesta de carácter militar a la crisis diplomática que sus relaciones con Ankara vienen atravesando desde enero de 2009. El objetivo de esa iniciativa es provocar dos crisis, una en el seno del Estado Mayor turco y otra entre este último y el actual gobierno de Turquía. Pero es posible que ello conduzca a una ruptura total de las relaciones militares entre Turquía e Israel, a pesar de que Turquía fue ''a lo largo de medio siglo'' el más importante aliado de Israel en la región. Por lo pronto, ya se anunció una anulación de las maniobras conjuntas turco-israelíes por tiempo indefinido. Esta crisis puede tener por demás repercusiones sobre las relaciones comerciales entre Turquía e Israel, en momentos en que Turquía es un socio vital para la economía israelí.

Israel estaba obligado, sin embargo, a destruir la credibilidad de Turquía en momentos en que ese país se halla en plena fase de acercamiento a Siria e Irán y muestra su aspiración a ejercer una autoridad regional junto a sus nuevos socios [3]. Por lo pronto, Israel tenía que castigar a Ankara por el papel que ha desempeñado en la negociación del Protocolo de Teherán sobre la industria nuclear iraní.

Todo el personal diplomático turco se ha puesto en función de plantear el problema creado a la mayor cantidad posible de Estados y organizaciones internacionales. En una conferencia de prensa, el propio viceprimer ministro Bulent Annc exigió la inmediata restitución de los tres barcos turcos y de su carga, así como "en primer lugar" la liberación de los cientos de ciudadanos turcos secuestrados. El viceprimer ministro calificó el ataque de acto de «piratería» (no de acto de guerra), ofreciendo así al gobierno de Netanyahu la posibilidad de presentar el asunto como un «exceso» y no como una política. Conforme a esa misma lógica, el presidente [turco] Abdullah Gul exigió por su parte que los tribunales israelíes juzguen a los responsables de la matanza.

Desde Chile, el primer ministro Erdogan declaró: «Esta acción es totalmente contraria a los principios del derecho internacional, es el terrorismo de un Estado inhumano. Yo me dirijo a todos los que han apoyado esa operación: Ustedes apoyan [el derramamiento de] sangre. Nosotros apoyamos el derecho humanitario y la paz».

En el transcurso de la tarde, Ankara planteó la cuestión ante el Consejo de la alianza atlántica. Turquía es miembro de la OTAN. En caso de no recibir la respuesta que espera de parte del gobierno israelí, Ankara pudiera calificar el ataque de acto de guerra y solicitar la ayuda militar de los Estados miembros de la OTAN invocando el artículo 5 del Tratado del Atlántico Norte.

El gobierno de Netanyahu ya exhortó a sus ciudadanos a salir de Turquía, donde manifestaciones espontáneas en las que la gente pide venganza están teniendo lugar ante los consulados de Israel.

El 26 de mayo de 2010, el primer ministro Benjamin Netanyahu se reúne un Tel Aviv con el secretario general de la Casa Blanca, Rahm Emmanuel. Este último le hizo entrega de una invitación enviada por el presidente Barack Obama, invitación que la parte israelí acaba de anular sólo 5 días después de su entrega.

En lo tocante a Estados Unidos, esta crisis recuerda a la que se produjo el 8 de junio de 1967 con el navío estadounidense USS Liberty. En plena Guerra de los Seis Días, los israelíes atacaron un navío de vigilancia electrónica de la US Navy, con saldo de 34 muertos y 171 heridos. Tel Aviv presentó excusas afirmando que se trataba de un "error" cometido en el campo de batalla, mientras que "aunque aceptó oficialmente las excusas israelíes" Washington interpretó el incidente como una ofensa deliberada. Se estima que, en aquel momento, los israelíes quisieron castigar así a los estadounidenses por haberlos criticado.

En el actual caso, el ataque contra la Flotilla de la Libertad puede ser una acción de castigo por el voto de Washington a favor de una resolución de los Estados firmantes del Tratado de No Proliferación [nuclear], resolución que exige que Israel declare sus armas nucleares y que acepte los controles del Organismo Internacional de la Energía Atómica.

La decisión israelí de atacar barcos civiles en aguas internacionales tiene lugar después del asesinato de un dirigente palestino perpetrado por una unidad del Mossad en los Emiratos Árabes Unidos, del descubrimiento de un extenso sistema de copia y falsificación de pasaportes emitidos por diferentes Estados occidentales y de la negativa israelí de asistir a la conferencia internacional de seguimiento del Tratado de No Proliferación [nuclear].

Esta secuencia de hechos puede interpretarse como una sucesión de violaciones cometidas por un Estado que se siente seguro de su impunidad ''y pudiera tratarse, en ese caso, de una violación más'' o como una escalada consecutiva a un breve desencuentro público con la administración estadounidense ''y se trataría entonces de una forma de proclamar el liderazgo del movimiento sionista demostrando que Tel Aviv toma decisiones y Washington no tiene más remedio que aceptarlas.

El primer ministro Benjamin Netanyahu, quien se encontraba de viaje por Norteamérica, decidió poner fin a su visita a Canadá y anular su encuentro con el actual inquilino de la Casa Blanca. No obstante, el presidente Obama lo contactó telefónicamente para pedirle explicaciones.

La Alta Comisionada de la ONU para los Derechos Humanos, Navi Pillay, declaró que no existe justificación alguna para la operación israelí. El Relator Especial sobre los Derechos Humanos en los territorios ocupados palestinos, Richard Falk, subrayó que, más allá de la violación de la libre circulación marítima, el problema central sigue siendo el bloqueo.

«Si no se implementan acciones inmediatas y decisivas para contrarrestar el enfoque israelí sobre Gaza, nosotros todos seremos cómplices de una política criminal que amenaza la supervivencia de una comunidad sitiada», declaró Falk.

El Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU fue convocado ha una reunión urgente. El ministro turco de Relaciones partió hacia Nueva York.



http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=19447

Texto em castelhano: http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=107031



Operation Justified Vengeance": Israeli Strike on Freedom Flotilla to Gaza is Part of a Broader Military Agenda
by Michel Chossudovsky

War Criminal Prime Minister Netanyahu, who directly ordered the strike on the international flotilla to Gaza, was on an official visit to Canada at the time of the Israeli attack. 

The strike constitutes an act of piracy in violation of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

Netanyahu's actions, which have resulted in 19 deaths and up to 60 injured, constitute a criminal act committed in international waters. (BBC News - Deaths as Israeli forces storm Gaza aid ship). 



In a cruel irony, Netanyahu, in a recent statement, committed himself to peace with Palestine: "We want to move as speedily as possible to direct talks because the kind of problem that we have with the Palestinians can be resolved in peace and can be arranged only if we sit down together". 

Several prominent personalities as well as several Global Research authors and partners were on board the ships.

The May 31st strike is a follow-up on "Operation Cast" initiated in late December 2008. It is meant to enforce the status of Gaza as a de facto urban prison. 

Operation "Cast Lead" was part of a broader military-intelligence operation initiated at the outset of the Ariel Sharon government in 2001. It was under Sharon's "Operation Justified Vengeance" that F-16 fighter planes were initially used to bomb Palestinian cities. The strike on the Freedom Flotilla is part of the logic of transforming Gaza into an urban concentration camp.  

"Operation Justified Vengeance" was presented in July 2001 to the Israeli government of Ariel Sharon by IDF chief of staff Shaul Mofaz, under the title "The Destruction of the Palestinian Authority and Disarmament of All Armed Forces". "Operation Justified Vengeance" was also referred to as the "Dagan Plan", named after General (ret.) Meir Dagan, who currently heads Mossad, Israel's intelligence agency. (See Ellis Shulman, Operation Justified Vengeance, A Secret to Destroy the Palestinian Authority, Global Research, 2002)  

Meir Dagan, in coordination with his US counterparts, had been put in charge of various military-intelligence operations. It is worth noting that Meir Dagan as a young Colonel had worked closely with then defense minister Ariel Sharon in the raids on Palestinian settlements in Beirut in 1982.

The 2009 ground invasion of Gaza, in many regards, bear a canny resemblance to the 1982 military operation led by Sharon and Dagan.

Dagan as head of Israeli intelligence, no doubt also took part in the decision to launch the strike on the Freedom Flotilla.

Was the Decision Taken in Consultation with Washington?

On May 26, the Israeli military (IDF) confirmed that it would confront the Freedom Flotilla in international waters, while intimating that there may be terrorist elements on board the ships:

"As part of the military preparation, the navy carried out an exercise intercepting ships and arresting passengers.

Navy Commander Major-General Eliezer Marom said the navy forces will use measures to protect the soldiers' lives and ensure that there are no terrorist elements or explosives on the ships.

Marom said he instructed the forces to act sensibly and avoid provocations, adding that the IDF had no intention of harming the hundreds of passengers on board these ships." (Israel's Military Command Says Will Stop Flotilla, but Transfer Supplies to Gaza)

It is worth noting that prior to this announcement, the IDF launched a public relations campaign, describing the Flotilla as a "provocative act":

"Head of Gaza 's Coordination and Liaison Authority, Colonel Moshe Levi convened a press conference and said that there was no shortage in food and supplies in the Strip.

"The planned flotilla to Gaza is a provocative act that is unnecessary under the existing conditions in the Gaza Strip, where the humanitarian situation is good and stable," he said, adding that Israel allows many products into the Strip, and only limits those that might serve Hamas in advancing terror activities." (Ibid)

Washington was fully aware as to the nature as well as the likely consequences of the IDF naval operation in international waters, including the killings of civilians. There are indications that the decision was taken in consultation with Washington.

The Role of Rahm Emmanuel

Obama's White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel was in Israel in the week prior to the launching of the raid on the Freedom Flotilla.

Although on a private visit, Rahm Emanuel met Prime Minister Netanyahu in high level discussions on May 26. Rahm Emanuel also met president Shimon Peres on May 27.  The White House described the May 26 meeting with Netanyahu as "an informal discussion of a range of issues in the U.S.-Israel bilateral relationship."

And on that same day (May 26), the IDF confirmed the launching of a military operation directed against the Freedom Flotilla. On May 26, Rahm Emanuel also extended an invitation to Netanyahu to meet president Obama in early June following his scheduled official visit to Canada. In recent developments, Netanyahu has cancelled his US trip and is returning to Tel Aviv.  



The Broader Military Agenda

It should be understood that the raid on the Flotilla also coincided with NATO-Israel war games directed against Iran. According to the Sunday Times "three German-built Israeli submarines equipped with nuclear cruise missiles are to be deployed in the Gulf near the Iranian coastline." (Israel Deploys Three Nuclear Cruise Missile-Armed Subs Along Iranian Coastline). The report tacitly presents Israel as the victim rather than the perpetrator of military threat:

"Israel’s business and defence centre, remains the most threatened city in the world, said one expert. “There are more missiles per square foot targeting Tel Aviv than any other city,” he said.


... The first [submarine] has been sent in response to Israeli fears that ballistic missiles developed by Iran, Syria and Hezbollah, a political and military organisation in Lebanon, could hit sites in Israel, including air bases and missile launchers.

The submarines of Flotilla 7 — Dolphin, Tekuma and Leviathan — have visited the Gulf before. But the decision has now been taken to ensure a permanent presence of at least one of the vessels.

 

The flotilla’s commander, identified only as “Colonel O”, told an Israeli newspaper: “We are an underwater assault force. We’re operating deep and far, very far, from our borders.”



 

... The deployment is designed to act as a deterrent, gather intelligence and potentially to land Mossad agents. “We’re a solid base for collecting sensitive information, as we can stay for a long time in one place,” said a flotilla officer.

 

The submarines could be used if Iran continues its programme to produce a nuclear bomb. “The 1,500km range of the submarines’ cruise missiles can reach any target in Iran,” said a navy officer.



 

Apparently responding to the Israeli activity, an Iranian admiral said: “Anyone who wishes to do an evil act in the Persian Gulf will receive a forceful response from us.” 


 

Israel’s urgent need to deter the Iran-Syria-Hezbollah alliance was demonstrated last month. Ehud Barak, the defence minister, was said to have shown President Barack Obama classified satellite images of a convoy of ballistic missiles leaving Syria on the way to Hezbollah in Lebanon. (emphasis added)

 

While these naval deployments were underway in the Persian Gulf, Israel was also involved in war games in the Mediterraean. The war game codenamed "MINOAS 2010" was carried out at a Greek air base in Souda Bay, on the island of Crete.



Also, in the wake of the decision directed against Israel's nuclear weapons under the auspices of the NPT, the White House reaffirmed not only its support to Israel, but also to Israel's nuclear weapons capabilities. The statement issued one day before the raid on the flotilla points to US support of "Israel's strategic and deterrence capabilities, which also include the launching of a pre-emptive nuclear attack on Iran:

"a senior political source in Jerusalem said Sunday that Israel received guarantees from U.S. President Barack Obama that the U.S. would maintain and improve Israel's strategic and deterrence capabilities.

According to the source, "Obama gave [Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu unequivocal guarantees that include a substantial upgrade in Israel-U.S. relations."

Obama promised that no decision taken during the recent 189-nation conference to review and strengthen the 40-year-old Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty "would be allowed to harm Israel's vital interests," the sources said.  Obama promised to bolster Israel's strategic capabilities, Jerusalem officials say - Haaretz Daily Newspaper)

The presence of Obama's Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel in Tel Aviv undoubtedly played a role in the timing of this Sunday May 30th statement as well as the concurrent strike on the Freedom Flotilla. The Obama administration had given the green light to the deadly raids in international waters.  

The killing of unarmed civilians was part of the mandate of the Israeli naval commando. It was an integral part of the logic of Dagan's "Operation Justified Vengeance", which presents Israel as the victim rather than the perpetrator and uses civilian deaths "on both sides" to justify a process of military escalation.  

The action by the IDF has triggered a wave of indignation throughout the Middle East. It will no doubt also trigger a response by Palestinian resistance forces, including possible suicide bomb attacks inside Israel, which could then be used by Israel as a pretext and justification for the launching a broader military operation. 

Iran is being portrayed in Western media reports as supportive of Hamas and the Freedom Flotilla is said to be backed by a tacit Hamas-Iran alliance. Realities are turned upside down. Israel is the victim. In the words of Benjamin Netanyahu: "Our soldiers had to defend themselves to defend their lives." In the words of Netanyahu at a press briefing in Ottawa:

“"Soldiers had boarded the vessel to check for any rockets, missiles or explosives headed for Gaza to be used for attacks on Israel, he said. They were mobbed, they were clubbed, they were beaten, stabbed, there was even a report of gunfire, and our soldiers had to defend themselves, defend their lives or else they would have been killed,” he said Monday during a visit with Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Netanyahu added: “Regrettably in the exchange at least 10 people died. We regret this loss of life. We regret any of the violence that was there. I would like to wish speedy recovery to the wounded, including four of our own soldiers.” (Quoted in the Toronto Star, May 31, 2010) (emphasis added)

Meanwhile, a White House spokesman has confirmed that the United States "deeply regrets the loss of life and injuries sustained". But the action by Israel has not been condemned by the Obama administration: The administration is "currently working to understand the circumstances surrounding this tragedy." (See The Associated Press: Obama administration concerned about Gaza incident)

For further details on Operation Cast Lead and Operation Justified Vengeance, see



Michel Chossudovsky, The Invasion of Gaza: "Operation Cast Lead", Part of a Broader Israeli Military-Intelligence Agenda
, Global Research, January 2009. 

http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2010/06/01/israeli-s-nuclear-policy-from-south-afri
Texto em castelhano: http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=107034

Israeli’s Nuclear Policy: From South Africa to Iran


June 1st, 2010 7:22 PM  

James Petras 

On May 24, 2010, the Guardian (U.K.) published a highly confidential document released by the South African government. The 1975 document reveals a secret military agreement signed by Shimon Peres, Israel’s Foreign Minister at the time (and today Israel’s President)  and South Africa’s Defense Minister P. W. Botha. Israel offered to sell the apartheid regime, weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear, chemical and conventional weaponry to destroy and defeat the million person African resistance movement. The Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organization, immediately set in motion the Lying Machine claiming the official minutes of the Israeli nuclear offer and a far reaching agreement on military ties between two apartheid regimes were merely a “conversation” (sic) and that Israel did not “make an offer”.[1] Then without blinking Israel’s apologists went on to contradict themselves by speculating that a nuclear agreement would not have had the approval of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin (Daily Alert May 25, 2010). The documents were discovered by a US academic, Sasha Polakow-Suransky, in South African archives and are published in his book, The Unspoken Alliance: Israel’s Secret Alliance with Apartheid South Africa. Apparently the Israeli’s regime thought the documents were more than a “conversation” because they pressured the post-apartheid South African government not to release them.[2]

The Israeli nuclear offer and the South African request took place at a time of rising popular struggles throughout South Africa, from Sharpeville to Soweto, including armed resistance and the beginning of international boycotts. South Africa expanded its military offensive invading Angola where they were eventually defeated by a joint Cuban-Angolan army. As a result it was facing problems buying the kinds of deadly weapons of mass destruction which would not only decapitate the leadership of the South African freedom movement but destroy its grass roots support and national allies. Israel was prepared to serve as a willing accomplice to a Nuclear Solution.The Genocidal Implications of Israel’s Nuclear Offer

Most liberal commentators and critics of Israel’s offer to supply apartheid South Africa with nuclear warheads merely focused on Israel’s “irresponsible behavior” in violating the non-proliferation treaty.[3] For others the issue was merely an “embarrassment” for the Jewish state, given a forthcoming meeting (June 2010) on non-proliferation.[4] Few if any raised the great moral and political question of the profound human consequences of complicity in a genocidal nuclear assault on millions of Africans. The question is Israel’s moral responsibility, if South Africa had followed up the Jewish State’s offer, bought the nuclear warheads and sent the missiles raining down on millions of Africans demanding freedom. One might ask if complicity in a potential genocidal act is subject to a war crimes tribunal, in the same way that the German industrial manufacturers of poison gas for concentration camp prisoners were put on trial at Nuremberg for complicity in the war crimes of the Nazi State.?[5]

Israel’s offer to supply nuclear missiles if implemented would most likely have led to the shelling of shanty towns and refugee camps across the borders, housing millions of South Africans, killing hundreds of thousands and radiating many more to a slow painful death. Nuking a mass popular resistance in this case through the deliberate efforts of two racist regimes, is more than a ‘war crime’, it is a monstrous crime against humanity.

More than any other single factor, American Zionism’s defense of Israel’s military alliance and support of Apartheid South Africa deeply offended knowledgeable Afro-Americans and soured longstanding amicable relations between Jews and American blacks.

On the other, Israel had no compunctions about strengthening its military and economic ties with racist South Africa[6], a relation backed by Zionist business leaders in Johannesburg.Why Israel Offered Nukes to Botha

Israel’s decision to offer nuclear missiles to South Africa was based on commercial, political and ideological considerations. South Africa was an emphatic and unconditional backer of Israel’s invasions of Arab countries, its occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. Above all it sympathized with a likeminded settler-colonial regime at a time when Israel was condemned by the United Nations, most of Europe, and the newly independent post-colonial countries. Two pariah states had a lot of common enemies and a need to support each other in the face of the world’s rejection of colonial-settler regimes.

Secondly, the two had an ideological affinity based on a racial ideology rooted in biblical belief of Chosen People destined by Divine power as Superior People. Judaism and Christianity rooted in ethnic pre-eminence legitimated rule over blacks and Arabs! Equally important arms sales and military advisory services were the leading export sectors of the Israeli economy and the backbone of its manufacturing, technology and communications sectors. The Zionist-racist trade union confederation Histadrut was deeply rooted among workers in the war industries and was a champion of arms sales to South Africa. Israeli Uzis upheld white capital and repressed  black labor especially in the mines.The Central Role of the Zionist Labor Left in the Nuclear Arms Offer

Contrary to the assumptions of many gentile and Jewish leftists, liberals and progressives who attribute all of Israel’s crimes against the Palestinians to neo-conservatives or “Likud” or rightwing religious parties, the authors and proponents of a nuclear weapons sales to South Africa were leaders of the Labor Party. Shimon Peres (the Defense Minister) and Yitzhak Rabin (Prime Minister) were the major figures involved in the nuclear deal. All of Israel’s early wars of conquests, massive expulsions of Palestinians and the construction of Israel’s nuclear weapons stockpile were undertaken under the aegis of the Labor Party. The latter never lacked in socialist rhetoric [they are members of the “Socialist” International (sic)] or anti-racist speeches when the occasion warranted, but never lost an opportunity to sell conventional arms to a Latin dictator (Pinochet in Chile, Videla in Argentina, Rios Mont in Guatemala), or offer nukes to a brutal South African regime under siege from its black majority.

The central role of the Israeli Labor Party in offering a nuclear solution to the minority white regime demonstrates that all major Israeli parties are capable of pursuing a genocidal policy if it serves their perceptions of “Jewish interests”.  The leading role of the Labor Party confirms the idea that there are no basic differences between the Israeli Left and Right when it comes to committing crimes against humanity. The underlying belief system is that Chosen People are exempt from the laws against war crimes.Nuclear Revelation: The Reactions of the Leading American Jewish Organizations

The Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organizations, true to their role as an unconditional transmission belt of the Israel state, echoed the line that Israel did not offer nuclear weapons to South Africa, denying the documented proof and predictably refused to condemn Israel’s complicity with the genocidal implications of nuking millions active in the  African freedom movement[7]. One of the leading Zionist organizations the “Anti Defamation League”, in fact had a long standing relation with South Africa’s secret services, hiring private agents to collect information and spy on the anti-apartheid movement up through the 1980’s.[8] Most of the Zionist influenced mass media including the New York Times, CBS, NBC, Fox, CNN and the Washington Post blocked the story ,as if Israel’s complicity in a plan nuking millions of Africans was unworthy of publication, let alone an object of the harshest condemnation. Let us be clear about why this crime, comparable to the Holocaust was not consummated. It was not because of any influence of the Hebraic moral traditions or “Jewish guilt” or even irresolution because of fear of the subsequent worldwide outcry. The Israeli sale of nukes did not go through because, according to authoritative South African accounts, thelatter decided not to go through with the purchase, relying on Israeli “conventional” arms instead.[9] There is no definitive explanation for why Israel’s nuclear war industry lost a sale but there are several possible explanations, from the high price that the Jewish state was asking, to the fear that the fallout from nuclear weapons might radiate whites as well as blacks. The “collateral costs” to the white racist population may have caused the apartheid regime to rethink its purchase.

Let us be clear: Israeli complicity in this venture into nuclear genocide was freely given, under no duress.  In fact the Jewish state in the best traditions of a Nazi haberdasher, offered the racist state a choice of three ‘styles’ of weapons: nuclear, chemical and conventional. Take your pick they all fit in nicely with protecting the user from any further annoyances by the black majority. Given the enormity of this crime of complicity, is it surprising that the Zionist and even most of the anti-Zionist media and spokespeople gave scant attention to this crime against humanity. A mention one day, a pronouncement here or there, nothing more. More likely, if the genocidal act was carried out, the moral outrage would have focused exclusively on … the South Africans not their weapon suppliers and accomplices before the act. What explains the fact that the vast majority of American Zionist Jews who play a leading role in defending and apologizing for Israel’s role in offering nukes to racist South Africa, are high income, well educated professionals, businesspeople, scientists, academics, media performers and the like? Many are respectable family persons and civic minded. A majority consider themselves liberals, defenders of the environment and social programs. A few even speak favorable of ‘democratic socialism’. Yet, they are the same individuals who willingly support and apologize for a regime ready and willing to supply the means to radiate millions of Africans in the past , nuke tens of millions of Iranians todayand massacre scores of peaceful humaniarians on the high seas.

The key to this apparent “contradiction” is the capacity of pro-Israel Jews to compartmentalize their professional work, family life and civic activity from their obsessive commitment to Israeli war crimes and genocidal pathologies. We have a case of respectable and focused high achievers with intense irrational attachments to a state engaged in crimes against humanity. An attachment voluntarily given and with full access to the knowledge and information pertaining to the deadly consequences of the Jewish state’s acts. Actions sanctioned at the highest level of the Israeli state and approved by the most prominent members of the mainline Jewish organizations.

Some liberal Jewish critics of Israel take offense at gentile and anti-zionist Jewish critics, accusing them of “picking on Israel”. This is a deliberate evasion, knowing full well that many of these same critics denounce criminal acts around the world. But there are reasons why Israel warrants special attention. It is the only state to offer nuclear weapons to a racist regime to destroy a liberation movement, nay an entire people. Israel is the only country which has blockaded an entire people 1.4 million Palestinians in Gaza, having bombed and destroyed their sources of water, food and habitation..Israel is the only country which butchers dozens of pacifists in international waters. More to the point today Israel along with its Zionized supporters in the US government are the only two regimes which openly threaten to launch a nuclear war of mass destruction against 72 millions Iranians.

Given what we know about Israel’s nuclear complicity with South Africa this is not idle speculation. The precedent of collaborating with South Africa in the proposed nuking of millions of Africans, with absolutely no moral compunctions, makes Israel the major nuclear threat in the Middle East today.

Raising the issue of Israel’s sale of nukes to South Africa is not merely a historical incident of academic interest. Some liberal Zionists might say “after all Israel didn’t actually supply the nuclear missiles and the South Africans didn’t nuke the blacks” …More to the point, the same Israeli and American Zionist mindset that threatens to use nuclear weapons against Iran, especially evident in the rantings of Secretary of State Clinton ,exhibits the same propensity to sell nuclear weapons as a means to resolve conflicts in the past.. Worse still Israel and its American Zionist followers have instilled the same moral indifference to genocide among vast sectors of their captive mass media audience and their colonized American Congressional and White House leaders. One has only to glance at the news reports of how Clinton dismissed the Turkey-Brazil-Iran diplomatic resolution of the enriched uranium exchange.[10] Clinton insists on proceeding with sanctions because her paymasters, led by ultra-Israel Firsters like Haim Saban, demand that Iran must be brought to its knees at best and nuked if necessary.[11] Clinton knows that new sanctions will destroy the negotiated compromise, even if it is on the same terms proposed by the US several months earlier. A compromise which Israel never accepted and now insists, through each and every major Jewish Organization that the United States should sabotage via new harsh sanctions.

Despite Clinton’s claim of a “consensus” on new sanctions, Russia, China, India , the league of Arab States and even France have publicly praised the Iran-Turkish-Brazil diplomatic agreement.[12] Only the British toadies themselves infested by Zionist parliamentarians at fundraisers toed the Clinton-Obama line. The question is whether the US Zionist power configuration, headed by Rahm Emmanuel and Hilary Clinton, will secure the sanctions over and above the wishes of governments representing two-thirds of mankind.

The policy of nuclear genocide by proxy, proposed by Israel toward Iran, is executed by its bimodal high achieving fifth columnists operating from the top positions in the State Department, National Security Council, Congress and above all in the White House. Let us remember and never forget that Israel’s willingness to supply nukes to South Africa has immense relevance to their efforts urging our own servile public officials to become perpetrators of nuclear genocide against 70 plus million Iranians. With racist South Africa, Israel was helping a racist ally and making a profit. With Iran it is destroying an adversary of colonial oppression.Today May 31,2010 American Zionists defend the Israeli assassination squad which machine gunned 600 pacifists,humanitarians,Nobel Prize winners,murdering 20 and wounding dozensin international waters. In both cases, Israel’s nuclear policy and its slaughter on the high seas,and their defense by American zionists are  acts of moral depravity. The sooner the Middle East – namely Israel – is denuclearized, and demilitarized and the USA dezionized the safer the world will be.

[1] Daily Alert May 24, 2010; Daily Alert May 25, 2010.


[2] BBC News May 24, 2010.
[3] Jonathan Cook, “Israel’s Nukes out of the Shadows” Counterpunch, May 26, 2010.
[4] Max Blumenthal, “The Banquos’ Ghost of Israeli Foreign Policy”, The Nation 5/23/10.
[5] Diarmuid Jeffreys, Hells Cartel: I.G. Farben and the Making of Hitler’s War Machine/ New York: Metropolitan Books 2008, especially Ch. 10 – 15.[6] Max Blumenthal op cit.
[7] Daily Alert May 24, 25 (2010).
[8] Blumenthal (op cit).
[9] Chris McGreal, “Revealed: How Israel Offered to Sell South Africa Nuclear Weapons” Guardian, May 24, 2010.
[10] Associated Press, May 25, 2010; AFP May 25, 2010.
[11] Connie Bruck, “The Influencer”, The New Yorker, May 10, 2010. Saban states his “greatest concern” is to influence American politics to “protect Israel”. His main vehicle and relationship is with Bill and Hilary Clinton, whom he showers with millions of dollars in political contributions.[12] Ray McGovern “US/Israel Challenged on Iran” Information Clearing House, May 22, 2010.

http://baragua.wordpress.com/2010/06/03/la-onu-una-herramienta-de-dominacion-imperialista/



Compartir con tus amigos:
  1   2


La base de datos está protegida por derechos de autor ©psicolog.org 2019
enviar mensaje

enter | registro
    Página principal


subir archivos